Journal Search Engine
Search Advanced Search Adode Reader(link)
Download PDF Export Citaion korean bibliography PMC previewer
ISSN : 2288-4637(Print)
ISSN : 2288-4645(Online)
The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business Vol.6 No.1 pp.289-301
DOI : http://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no1.289

Development and Application of a Sensemaking Approach to Community-based Disaster Risk Governance

Choongik Choi1, Hirokazu Tatano2, Junho Choi3
1 First Author, Professor, Department of Public Administration, Kangwon National University. South Korea.
2 Professor, DPRI, Kyoto University, Japan.
3 Corresponding Author, Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Public Administration, Kangwon National University, South Korea, Tel: +82-33-250-6810, E-mail: smolts80@gmail.com
December 18, 2018 December 31, 2018 January 10, 2019

Abstract

This paper explores community-based flood disaster risk governance by applying a sensemaking approach. The conceptual sensemaking framework consists of individual experience, dialogue, and socialization components, which together comprise an interconnected system. This study presents a method for applying this framework by using a concerns table and a SWOT analysis to examine the concerns of residents living in a flood plain. A series of community-based workshops on flood risk reduction was conducted with residents of the floodprone Muraida community in Shiga Prefecture, Japan. During the workshops, residents’ concerns regarding flood risk surfaced. This study used an idiographic approach to examine the proceedings of the workshops. SWOT issue analysis was used to examine the strengths and weaknesses in the Muraida community’s internal capacities, and examine the opportunities and threats in the external capacities (e.g., local government). Additionally, a SWOT strategy analysis was conducted to identify strategies for knowledge sharing and development of cooperative countermeasures that can be undertaken between the Muraida community and the local government. The results show that the concerns table can not only summarize the main concerns of all workshops, but also provide an understanding of alternative flood risk countermeasures that can be carried out.

JEL Classification Code: D70, D74, D83, H75, O21.

초록


 

Figure

Table

Reference

  1. Choi, C., & Choi, J. (2018a). Development and distribution of risk governance framework in terms of socially viable solutions. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 5(3), 185-193.
  2. Choi, C., & Choi, J. (2018b). Distribution and application of community-based disaster risk information: Lessons from Shiga Prefecture in Japan. Journal of Distribution Science, 16(6), 15-23.
  3. Dervin, B. (1999). Sense-Making’s theory of dialogue: A brief introduction. Paper presented at a non-divisional workshop held at the meeting of the International Communication Association. San Francisco, CA: International Communication Association.
  4. Dibb, S. (2003). A risky business: towards better risk governance. Consumer Policy Review, 1(4), 132-138.
  5. Gergen, K. J. (1994). Toward transformation in social knowledge (2nd edition). London, UK: Sage Publications.
  6. Hill, T., & Westbrook, R. (1997). SWOT analysis: It’s time for a product recall. Long Range Planning, 30(1), 46-52.
  7. IRGC (2005). White paper on risk governance: Toward an integrative approach. Geneva, Switzerland: The International Risk Governance Council.
  8. Lee, J. (2016). Corporate Governance and Cash Holdings in Retail Firms. Journal of Distribution Science, 14(12), 129-139.
  9. Pearce, W. B. (1994). Interpersonal communication: Making social worlds. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
  10. Rauch, P. (2007). SWOT analyses and SWOT strategy formulation for forest owner cooperations in Austria. European Journal of Forest Research, 126, 413–420.
  11. Renn, O. (1997). Three decades of risk research: Accomplishments and new challenges, Journal of Risk Research, 1(1), 49-71.
  12. Renn, O. (2006). Risk communication - consumers between information and irritation. Journal of Risk Research, 9(8), 833-850.
  13. Renn, O., & Schweizer, P. (2009). Inclusive risk governance: concepts and application to environmental policy making, Environmental policy and Governance, 19(3), 174-185.
  14. Salehi, M., & Asgar, A. (2013). Corporate governance and earnings quality: the Iranian evidence. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(6), 5-11.
  15. Samaddar, S., Choi, J., Misra, B. A., & Tatano, H. (2015). Insights on social learning and collaborative action plan development for flood risks mitigation: Practicing yonmenkaigi system method (YSM) in hotspot Mumbai. Natural Hazards, 75(2), 1531-1554.
  16. Samaddar, S., Okada, N., Choi, J., & Tatano, H. (2017). What constitutes successful participatory disaster risk management? Insights from post-earthquake reconstruction work in rural Gujarat, India. Natural Hazards, 85(1), 111-138.
  17. Vanclay, F. (2002). Conceptualizing social impact. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22, 183-211
  18. Weick, K. (2001). Making Sense of the organization. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
  19. Weick, K., Sutcliffe, K., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409-421.
  20. Weihrich, H. (1982). The TOWS matrix: A tool for situational analysis. Long Range Planning, 15, 54-66.
  21. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P. M., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At risk. Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. London, UK: Routledge.
  22. Yamori, K. (2009). Action research on disaster reduction education: Building a community of practice through a gaming approach. Journal of Natural Disaster Science, 30, 83–96.